'That website is run by a pro-life group, so it HAS to be biased. Pro-life groups CAN'T be unbiased. ONLY pro-choice websites are unbiased!!1!’
"Reality has a well-known liberal bias."
If it’s my body then why do I have to wear a seatbelt? If I don’t, I get a ticket. BUT ITS MY BODY. Although, I can kill the baby that’s inside me, because it’s my body. Please tell me the difference.
So I come back to lay down some awesome pro-choice smackdowns and all I can do is sit here and literally shake my head because the abortion tag is full of shit like this.
dweebzilla said: I'm just curious- is the asterisk you put after "men" and "women" there to be trans-inclusive? If so, thank you. Little things like that make me happy, especially considering I'm a man who plans on making use of his uterus later in life.
I try to be as inclusive as possible with my wording regarding people’s bodies.
belight-youare-alreadymine said: Are you a blog solely devoted to pro-abortion related things?
Anonymous said: You ignorant scum. What if your mother had had an abortion? Think of a child you love, or just anyone you love. They could have been killed. There are other choices than abortion. A baby is still a baby whether or not it has taken it's first breath or not. It's life. Anything that can be killed has to have life, right? You sicken me.
Happy I could be of service to you!
One of the many, many demands the GOP is making right now is a “conscience clause” that will allow both employers and insurers to deny their employees the right to birth control on a “moral basis.” Yes, they want to make it so your boss can decide whether or not you’re allowed to get birth control with your insurance. I mean, who wouldn’t want to confront their boss and have to justify why they need a basic medication? Isn’t the idea of discussing religious ideology with the person who controls whether you get a paycheck exciting?
This is why I would rather let the government shut down.